• Germany & Cyberspace
  • Does infrastructure crimes with Nix and Ansible.

  • Joined on 2024-01-14
june commented on pull request CCCHH/ansible-infra#112 2026-07-17 18:30:03 +02:00
alloy(role): pull in alloy role that works from fux

This doesn't do anything as a default is provided.

june commented on pull request CCCHH/ansible-infra#112 2026-07-17 18:30:03 +02:00
alloy(role): pull in alloy role that works from fux

Recomanded -> Recommended

june commented on pull request CCCHH/ansible-infra#112 2026-07-17 18:30:03 +02:00
alloy(role): pull in alloy role that works from fux

Recomanded -> Recommended

june commented on pull request CCCHH/ansible-infra#112 2026-07-17 18:30:03 +02:00
alloy(role): pull in alloy role that works from fux

Maybe have this be an alloy variable which is documented in the README as well? See the comment in the README, if we move this config to the group vars then the this variable can be kept as is.

june suggested changes for CCCHH/ansible-infra#112 2026-07-17 18:30:03 +02:00
alloy(role): pull in alloy role that works from fux

Thanks for implementing the changes, some small comments.

june commented on pull request CCCHH/ansible-infra#112 2026-07-17 18:30:03 +02:00
alloy(role): pull in alloy role that works from fux

Since alloy_config_default has a default configuration set, it should be listed under Optional Arguments. I guess another option would be to truly have this as a required configuration and then…

june commented on pull request CCCHH/ansible-infra#112 2026-07-17 18:29:06 +02:00
alloy(role): pull in alloy role that works from fux

The tag is still here, we already have the alloy tag in the playbook, so it can just be removed.

june commented on pull request CCCHH/ansible-infra#121 2026-07-11 23:11:49 +02:00
Update actions/upload-artifact action to v7

Fails.

june closed pull request CCCHH/ansible-infra#121 2026-07-11 23:11:49 +02:00
Update actions/upload-artifact action to v7
june closed pull request CCCHH/ansible-infra#120 2026-07-11 23:11:35 +02:00
Update actions/upload-artifact action to v6
june commented on pull request CCCHH/ansible-infra#120 2026-07-11 23:11:35 +02:00
Update actions/upload-artifact action to v6

Fails.

june closed pull request CCCHH/ansible-infra#119 2026-07-11 23:11:21 +02:00
Update actions/upload-artifact action to v5
june commented on pull request CCCHH/ansible-infra#119 2026-07-11 23:11:19 +02:00
Update actions/upload-artifact action to v5

Fails.

june closed pull request CCCHH/ansible-infra#118 2026-07-11 23:11:05 +02:00
Update actions/upload-artifact action to v4
june commented on pull request CCCHH/ansible-infra#118 2026-07-11 23:11:05 +02:00
Update actions/upload-artifact action to v4

Fails.

june pushed to main at CCCHH/ansible-infra 2026-07-11 22:55:51 +02:00
2a576495da
separate multiple major release upgrades
june deleted branch separate_major_releases from CCCHH/ansible-infra 2026-07-11 22:55:51 +02:00
june merged pull request CCCHH/ansible-infra#117 2026-07-11 22:55:50 +02:00
separate multiple major release upgrades
june approved CCCHH/ansible-infra#117 2026-07-11 22:55:43 +02:00
separate multiple major release upgrades

Nice improvement! I think this won't cause too much additional effort really and makes stuff just safer.

june commented on pull request CCCHH/ansible-infra#112 2026-07-11 13:47:02 +02:00
alloy(role): pull in alloy role that works from fux

This can be moved into the next step or is there a reason to have this in a separate step?