June june · they/sie
0 followers · 0 following
  • Germany & Cyberspace

  • Does infrastructure crimes with Nix and Ansible.

  • Joined on 2024-01-14
Repositories
2
 Projects Packages Code Public activity Starred repositories
8
june pushed to new_forgejo_runner at CCCHH/ansible-infra 2026-07-03 03:41:03 +02:00
6360daa969
 forgejo-runner(host): configure some more labels for more images
june pushed to main at CCCHH/oci-images 2026-07-02 03:35:49 +02:00
a866d88b50 Update actions/checkout action to v7
june deleted branch renovate/actions-checkout-7.x from CCCHH/oci-images 2026-07-02 03:35:49 +02:00
june merged pull request CCCHH/oci-images#8 2026-07-02 03:35:49 +02:00
Update actions/checkout action to v7
june commented on pull request CCCHH/ansible-infra#95 2026-07-01 04:05:44 +02:00
Update actions/upload-artifact action to v7

Doesn't seem to be working with Forgejo Runners.

june closed pull request CCCHH/ansible-infra#95 2026-07-01 04:05:44 +02:00
Update actions/upload-artifact action to v7
june pushed to new_forgejo_runner at CCCHH/ansible-infra 2026-06-24 21:58:50 +02:00
ab4e32f461
 forgejo-runner(host): configure forgejo-runner setup
june commented on pull request CCCHH/ansible-infra#106 2026-06-24 21:58:12 +02:00
New Forgejo Runner

Guess question would be, if we really need the full-sized images (extracted 60GB disk space usage) or if the act versions are fine for us (which are the same that Codeberg use).

june commented on pull request CCCHH/ansible-infra#106 2026-06-24 21:51:18 +02:00
New Forgejo Runner

Sure, can add those!

june commented on pull request CCCHH/ansible-infra#106 2026-06-24 21:49:24 +02:00
New Forgejo Runner

Would do that once we have proper resolvers we run ourself. This isn't the case right now afaik.

june pushed to new_forgejo_runner at CCCHH/ansible-infra 2026-06-23 21:33:24 +02:00
edd1984517
 forgejo-runner(host): configure forgejo-runner setup
june pushed to new_forgejo_runner at CCCHH/ansible-infra 2026-06-23 21:32:59 +02:00
a4f1f9b9fe
 forgejo-runner(host): configure forgejo-runner setup
e83b6ff318
 docker(role): document gVisor issue with user-def. br. and provide help
d2ace350b0
 docker(role): provide option to set up gVisor (runsc runtime)
0e82b7b34f
 forgejo_runner(role): create role for setting up Forgejo Runner install
Compare 4 commits »
june created pull request CCCHH/ansible-infra#106 2026-06-23 21:05:29 +02:00
New Forgejo Runner
june pushed to new_forgejo_runner at CCCHH/ansible-infra 2026-06-23 21:00:49 +02:00
fdd9eadad1
 docker(role): document gVisor issue with user-def. br. and provide help
f956ed6f35
 docker(role): provide option to set up gVisor (runsc runtime)
d4a1dee108
 forgejo_runner(role): create role for setting up Forgejo Runner install
6e61fe7886
 forgejo-runner(host): basic setup
Compare 4 commits »
june created branch new_forgejo_runner in CCCHH/ansible-infra 2026-06-23 21:00:49 +02:00
june approved CCCHH/ccchh-website#170 2026-06-17 17:42:43 +02:00
Add a status canary hidden string

Think this should work nicely. If @jtbx is happy with it, let's merge it.

june pushed to main at CCCHH/ansible-infra 2026-06-04 00:55:11 +02:00
fa6e280594
 www2/www3(host): remove hosts as they got removed
june pushed to main at CCCHH/ansible-infra 2026-06-04 00:41:07 +02:00
7b48f1ebe7
 status(host): fix auth-dns ccchh.net check by moving to new entry
june pushed to main at CCCHH/nix-infra 2026-05-27 18:52:24 +02:00
9a9f1c774c
 diday.org: remove (not-working) did.hamburg.ccc.de extra domain name
june pushed to no_diday_in_june at CCCHH/ccchh-website 2026-05-25 22:41:11 +02:00
d31a905a5b
 Ankündigung: kein DIDAY im Juni